![]() I usually never need to clean up on my 1 man projects, on the others I do it around every 3 or 4 months. I'm aware that you may be referring to exactly the way I do it - are you? In that case, this would be to clean up your dev branches from local after checking out, is that right? In all of my 1 man projects I do it like that, if there's a team ( >1 ), I like to do the "diaspora" workflow I linked to. Personally I may have master, development, and if I really must, a "messing around" branch. eg: IF, you created a branch that was, // not pushed it will remain along with amster. Nevertheless, I'm interested in how different people code in their own ways. To delete all Git branches except master or main, switch branches and delete all using git branch grep -v mastermain xarg git branch -D command. // - Clear all branches except Master Branch - git branch -D (git branch grep -v 'master') // This will clear all your branches you have on local that you have // not pushed to your repository. Not misenterpreting, rather we just have a different workflow, ( a branch per issue if you would like to think at it like that). Thus, we add a few arguments to exclude master and develop branches. ![]() git branch -merged There may be some branches that you do not want to delete. very large teams - of maybe 15 - 30+ developers would have many branches to be reconciled, but this post states distinctly local work (so I assume, it's on one man's machine, or am I misinterpreting? Steps to deleting already merged branches Here are the steps you need to take and get the job done properly: Listing branches List all the branches that were merged in the remote. This could work for a solo project, but on a 2+ man team, this would not work as well. Sill question, maybe, but why not just work with 2, 3 or 4 if you really must branches? There's a post from my friend here: =EnriqueVidal that lets you remove remote branches that have been merged to master, so you can keep things neat on the remote side as well. Also it is useless to keep a 3 month old branch if it has been merged to master or no longer relevant. Most if not all the time, we simply forget or don't care to remove those development branches from our local repository, and thus can take up hard drive space. There are two syntaxes for deleting remote branches: git push -deleteIn short, we create a develpment branch for every issue/bug we want to work on, and then merge into master. Git automatically expands the serverfix branchname out to refs/heads/serverfix:refs/heads/serverfix, which means, Take my serverfix local branch and push it. This guide over here: it is essentially what we do. ![]() I've worked on 2 different companies since I've used Git to manage development for projects. This is a safe operation in that Git prevents you from deleting the branch if it has unmerged changes. git branch -d Delete the specified branch. git branch Create a new branch called branch.This is synonymous with git branch -list. It is interesting to know how other people deal with complexity and how teams manage branches. List all of the branches in your repository. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |